Excerpt from the article “The Sweet Sixteen”
By Arthur Ward, FreedmenAbsolute.com
Family: This is the point at which the establishment of our reparational due
has to transition from cosplayers, politics, and emotionality to cold historic
empiricism – riding on objectively conclusive calculations finalizing with a
substantive end.
Evanston, IL and no other “local reparations” scheme has, can, or will
accomplish this.
Housing is an understandable target for local atonement regarding
municipally committed circumscriptions, deprivations, and direct harms of
various kinds. But – in a reparations environment – every entity targeted for
eventual recompense being extracted, that extraction must come to a
comprehensive conclusion. Mere housing assistance, something that should
only be done in an “equity” environment should NEVER in any way be
intentionally mislabeled as “reparations” and mercilessly “sold” as such to an
unjustified, uninformed, and very hungry constituency.
Any organization that lays this trick bag on the public will in time be
perceived as dirty cajolers and open swindlers. You must know what you are
looking at, Family. Politicians that accept the flatteries of those corrupt
organizations and implement their fraudulent suggestions could be perceived
as either full idiots or willfully corrupt themselves. Once that targeted
electorate figures things out? Oops!!!
Back to a comprehensive conclusion. One cause can generate a multiplicity
of effects. Those effects land where they land. And far reach where they
eventually reach. There. And in the case of Black exclusion, diminution, and
traumatization – comprehensive conclusions born of exhaustive examinations
are the only correct ends. With direct cash payments. Understand? Ends that
run far deeper and wider than nearly symbolic acts of local atonement. Far
deeper than the mere dragging of a defendant into a courtroom to
institutionally adjudicate a tort or injury claim.
Far more than questionably fair hearing and ambiguously just recompense.
And quoting the quote from above: “Finally, NAARC is extensively engaged
in providing assistance to and certifying municipal, local, and state
reparations initiatives utilizing the milestone Evanston Reparations Initiative,
which was certified by NAARC, as a flexible replicable model.” OK?
“Flexible?” “Replicable?” A “certification?” Attached to what authority? A
“model?” What? Where else is this working? The Evanston reparations sh*t
scheme is something that even legislatures whose members possess the
lowest straight-to-hell moralities and commit the highest prosecutable levels
of corruption – should be too embarrassed to replicate.
Point Blank.
As far as handling Reparations at ANY level; I would trust Rachel Dolezal to
provide better expertise than Kamm Howard. I would have a higher
confidence of trust with Bernie Madoff than Robin Rue Simmons. That’s
what we’re dealing with.
“The National African American Reparations Commission (NAARC) is
comprised of leading African American activists, scholars, professionals, and
experts in the fields of law, economics, politics, health, education, politics,
health, education, religion, labor, and community development.”
See that quote? The way that the scheme in Evanston is falling apart – it
doesn’t seem like all of the experts cited in the quote are providing any real
expertise or sound advice. For example: One major thing that was not
covered or dealt with was the tax liability impact on cash payments. The
State of Illinois has an income tax. That means the potential tax liability on a
$25K payment can be up to 40% between state and federal. Where were
those “experts” in the fields of “law, economics, and politics?” Where was
the “pre-reparations” groundwork that should have been done at the state and
federal levels to get legislation passed to make these kinds of payments tax
exempt? Insurance and other-generated settlements or indebtedness erasures
are tax exempt. They couldn’t get “local reparations” exempt as well?
A “no brainer” – if you are a “reparations expert” it would seem to me.
Shouldn’t all reparational transactions be smooth, seamless, and
unencumbered?
Bottom-up “local reparations” schemes edge American Reparations (which is
potentially the most serious and consequential atonement project in world
history) into “unserious” territory. Folks like Kamm Howard (Reparations
United) have came up with stupid-sounding terms like “reparations triage.”
What? – We have Pan African caballists dreaming up unneeded and
interposing non-profit structures like “trust authorities” and “stakeholder
authorities.” When everyone else that has been reparated by the federal
government so far receives their money directly from the United States
Treasury with no intermediaries touching it? We shouldn’t get the same
non-paternalistic treatment? Can’t grown people handle their own money?
Check out this quote from a quote on page 5 of Kamm Howard’s horribly
written book: “Laying the Foundation For Local Reparations” (ISBN
9798657538717):
Read more of this article at Freedmen Absolute at:
https://freedmenabsolute.com/2023/04/08/the-sweet-sixteen/